| Link | Title | Author |
|---|
link
| The value of competitive debate as a vehicle for promoting development of critical thinking ability | Bill Hill |
link
| The need for an argumentative perspective for academic debate | Robert Trapp |
link
| An answer to the call for experimentation by the CEDA assessment conference: a descriptive study of a peer-judged round | Sam Cox, Clifton Adams |
link
| Debating values: an idea revitalized | Kathleen Micken, Patrick Micken |
link
| Dominant form and marginalized voices: argumentation about feminism(s) | Carrie Crenshaw |
link
| Feminism, strategy, and pedagogy in intercollegiate debate | Robert Rowland |
link
| A response to Crenshaw’s ‘Dominant form and marginalized voices’ | Joseph Tuman |
link
| Pieces of a cultural puzzle | Carrie Crenshaw |