| Link | Title | Author |
|---|
link
| The nature of the topic in value debate | Walter Urlich |
link
| A case for debating propositions of policy | Bertram Gross |
link
| Justification of values in terms of action: rationale for a modified policy-making paradigm in value debate | M. Anway Jones, Stephen Crawford |
link
| Propositional analysis: a need for focus in CEDA debate | Tim Dixon, Chris Leslie |
link
| On prima facie value argumentation: the policy implications affirmative | Gregory Young, Paul Gaske |
link
| On negative strategy in value debate | Alan Cirlin |
link
| An alternative approach to negative speaker duties | Michael Gotcher, Thompson Biggars |
link
| The case against counterwarrants in value proposition debate | Rich Simon |
link
| Debating hasty generalization | David Berube |
link
| Theoretical illegitimacy of speculative value objections | Richard Dempsey |
link
| An audience analysis curriculum: its theory, practice and implications | Thomas Miller, Kenneth McVay |
link
| An analysis of CEDA and NDT judging philosophies | Mike Allen, Lisa Dowdy |
link
| On consideration of judging in CEDA debate tournaments — a modest proposal | Thompson Biggars, Michael Gotcher |
link
| Judging CEDA debate: a systems perspective | Steven Brydon |
link
| Towards a paradigm for CEDA | James Hallmark |
link
| A projection of CEDA’s near future | Don Brownlee |