| Link | Title | Author |
|---|
| link | Resolutional relevance: a primary standard for evaluating criteria in non-policy debate | Thomas Murphy, Melinda Murphy |
| link | Parameters for criteria debating | David Berube |
link
| Development of the method of evaluation in CEDA debate | Vince Meldrum |
link
| The potential for generic argumentation in Cross Examination Debate Association debate: toward the development of standards | Thomas Preston |
link
| The application of proximate cause to CEDA debate | Irwin Mallin |
link
| A process perspective of definitional arguments | Richard O’Dor |
link
| College debate: a quarter century later | Thomas Steinfatt |
link
| An analysis of CEDA judging philosophies - part two: accepting certain tactics and arguments with reservations | James Brey |
link
| Taking CEDA debaters out of the normal tournament setting | Pamela Stepp |
link
| To disclose or not to disclose? | Mark Smith |