| Link | Title | Author |
|---|
link
| Using argument fields to construct criteria in non-policy debate | Bill Hill |
link
| What killed Schrodinger’s cat? parametric topicality, that’s what | David Berube |
link
| The impact of paradigm consistency on taxonomic boundaries in CEDA debate | Craig Dudczak, Donald Day |
link
| Inexperienced and experienced debate judges: beyond ‘name calling’ | Sam Cox, Tammy Honse |
link
| Meaning as language use: the case of the language-linked value objection | Ken Bahm |
link
| Black participation in CEDA debate: a quantification and analysis | Peter Loge |
link
| A study of CEDA and NDT finalists speaking rates | Kent Colbert |
link
| What do they have that I haven’t got? comparison survey data of the resources and support systems of top CEDA programs and directors | Jack Rogers |
link
| A report on the 1991 CEDA assessment conference | Walter Ulrich |
link
| A bibliometric analysis of the CEDA yearbook | Don Brownlee, Julia Johnson, Mike Buckley |