| Link | Title | Author |
|---|
| link | Resolutional relevance: A primary standard for evaluating criteria in non-policy debate | Thomas Murphy, Melinda Murphy |
| link | Parameters for criteria debating | David Berube |
| link | Development of the method of evaluation in CEDA debate | Vince Meldrum |
| link | The potential for generic argumentation in Cross Examination Debate Association debate: Toward the development of standards | Thomas Preston |
| link | The application of proximate cause to CEDA debate | Irwin Mallin |
| link | A process perspective of definitional arguments | Richard O’Dor |
| link | College debate: A quarter century later | Thomas Steinfatt |
| link | An analysis of CEDA judging philosophies - part two: Accepting certain tactics and arguments with reservations | James Brey |
| link | Taking CEDA debaters out of the normal tournament setting | Pamela Stepp |
| link | To disclose or not to disclose? | Mark Smith |