While Contemporary Argumentation and Debate no longer has a website, I aim to fix this and actualize what the journal itself once said :
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
The following is the compiled index of every file that I’ve found.
Known missing articles
The following articles still need PDFs. Two existing files contain a different article and need replacement. This list records known gaps; historical coverage is still being checked.
Volume Title Author Status 2 Psychological presumption: Its place in value topic debate Raymond Zeuschner, Charlene Hill PDF not yet located 2 CEDA’s objectives: Lest we forget Jack Howe PDF not yet located 5 A projection of CEDA’s near future Don Brownlee Existing file contains The philosophy and development of CEDA by James E. Tomlinson 5 The case against counterwarrants in value proposition debate Rich Simon Existing file contains Debating hasty generalization by David M. Berube
Volume 1
Volume 1
Link Title Author link Theoretical implications of debating non-policy propositions Bill Henderson link Criteria for evaluating non-policy argument David Zarefsky link A situationally-guided perspective for propositions of judgement Robert Trapp link Presumption, presumption, wherefore art thou presumption? Jan Vasilius link Advocacy and values Don Brownlee link Value proposition debate: A pragmatic approach Jan Vasilius
Link to original
Volume 2
Volume 2
Link Title Author missing CEDA’s objectives: Lest we forget Jack Howe link A rationale for developing a CEDA program James Tomlinson link An alternative to NDT debate Beverly Kelley link Reflections on CEDA debate - 1980 - 1981 Don Swanson link Why not a national tournament? James Johnson missing Psychological presumption: Its place in value topic debate Raymond Zeuschner, Charlene Hill link Avoidance of the false claim: Some considerations for debating and judging propositions of value Randolph Scott, Tony Wynn link In search of topicality: Definitions and contexts Don Brownlee
Link to original
Volume 3
Volume 3
Link Title Author link Debate should be a laughing matter Jack Howe link The art of cross-examination Thomas Miller, Evan Caminker link Value benefits analysis as an affirmative paradigm Raymond Zeuschner link The role of values in policy controversies Michael Bartanen link Increasing value clash: A propositional and structural approach Stephen Verch, Brenda Logue link The consequences of quantification Don Brownlee
Link to original
Volume 4
Volume 4
Link Title Author link The philosophy and development of CEDA James Tomlinson link CEDA vs. NDT: A dysfunctional myth Allan Louden link Back to basics: An intercultural approach to value proposition debate Janet Vasilius link The process of valuing as a test of the existence of a value claim Don Swanson link Philosophical systems as paradigms for value debate Walter Ulrich link Remembering what the C.E. stands for: Toward a greater role for cross-examination in CEDA debate Rob Norton link We ought to be afraid of ‘should’ but should we be afraid of ‘ought’? Raymond Zeuschner link Presumption in the value proposition realm Dwight Podgurski
Link to original
Volume 5
Volume 5
Link Title Author link The nature of the topic in value debate Walter Urlich link A case for debating propositions of policy Bertram Gross link Justification of values in terms of action: Rationale for a modified policy-making paradigm in value debate M. Anway Jones, Stephen Crawford link Propositional analysis: A need for focus in CEDA debate Tim Dixon, Chris Leslie link On prima facie value argumentation: The policy implications affirmative Gregory Young, Paul Gaske link On negative strategy in value debate Alan Cirlin link An alternative approach to negative speaker duties Michael Gotcher, Thompson Biggars different article — needs replacement The case against counterwarrants in value proposition debate Rich Simon link Debating hasty generalization David Berube link Theoretical illegitimacy of speculative value objections Richard Dempsey link An audience analysis curriculum: Its theory, practice and implications Thomas Miller, Kenneth McVay link An analysis of CEDA and NDT judging philosophies Mike Allen, Lisa Dowdy link On consideration of judging in CEDA debate tournaments — a modest proposal Thompson Biggars, Michael Gotcher link Judging CEDA debate: A systems perspective Steven Brydon link Towards a paradigm for CEDA James Hallmark different article — needs replacement A projection of CEDA’s near future Don Brownlee
Link to original
Volume 6
Volume 6
Link Title Author link Interorganizational cooperation Charles Willard link The legal system as a source of values Walter Urlich link It’s time for open season on squirrels! Jack Howe link Counter-warrants: A method for testing topical justification in CEDA debate Greg Tolbert, Steve Hunt link Reflections on solvency in quasi-policy propositions Susan Milsap, Scott Milsap link A single swallow and other leaps of faith Thompson Biggars link Eliminating the abuses of CEDA debate: The debate judge as a referee Walter Urlich link The audience standard Robert Weiss link A metaparadigm for judging CEDA debate: On viewing the judge as an assessor Alan Cirlin link Judging attitudes and paradigmatic preferences in CEDA debate: A cumulative and construct validity investigation Paul Gaske, Drew Kugler, John Theobald
Link to original
Volume 7
Volume 7
Link Title Author link A model for analysis of propositions of judgment Ann Gill link The indivisibility of value claims from policy propositions: An argument for policy in value debate Dale Herbeck, Kimball Wong link On being ‘prima facie’—an application to non-policy argument Russell Church link The function of criteria in non-policy argumentation: Burdens and approaches Mark Cole, Ronald Boggs, Kevin Twohy link Evaluating cross-examination in CEDA debate: On getting our act together Alan Cirlin link State of CEDA, 1986 Walter Urlich link CEDA: Male/female participation levels - a research report Brenda Logue link Ethical obligations of the forensic educator Walter Ulrich
Link to original
Volume 8
Volume 8
Link Title Author link Turnarounds are fair play: An examination of turnarounds in competitive debate Steven Mister, Greg Tolbert link When the whole is greater than the sum of the parts: The implications of holistic resolutional focus Jeffrey Bile link The straw argument in affirmative case approaches in CEDA debate Thomas Jewell link The role of justification in topic analysis Nancy Adams, Tim Wilkins link Comparing values: A review of axiological standards for analytical value hierarchies Ronald Boggs link Cross-examination in CEDA debate: A survey of coaches Suzanne Larson link Application of the issues-agenda paradigm to speaker duties in value debate Michael Bartenen link 1AR—a reassessment Stephen Wood link Approaches to support and refutation of criteria Don Brownlee
Link to original
Volume 9
Volume 9
Link Title Author link Debating propositions of value: An idea revisited Ronald Matlon link Inherency as a stock issue in non-policy propositions Craig Dudczak link Intrinsic justification: Meaning and method Kenneth Bahm link When the whole becomes a black hole: Implications of the holistic perspective Arnie Madsen, Robert Chandler link Catastrophe and criterion: A case for justification Ann Gill link Definitional issues in the pursuit of argumentative understandings: A critique of contemporary practice James Cantrill link Propositional justification: Another view Jeffrey Bile link Assessing counter-warrants: Understanding induction in debate practice Brian McGee link The forensics critic as an ‘ideologue-critic’: An argument for ideology as a new paradigm for academic debate Gregory Miller link A cognitive model of evaluating judgments Don Brownlee, Mark Woolsey link The role of the critic and the audience-centered model of debate: Problems and possibilities J. Michael Gotcher, Ronald Greene link Knowing the judge: The key to successful debate Mary Gill
Link to original
Volume 10
Volume 10
Link Title Author link Advocacy, values and cost/benefit analysis Don Brownlee, Mark Croassman link Topicality: An equal ground standard Craig Dudczak link Toward a holistic model of presumption for non-policy debate Bill Hill link Context exploration: Paradigmatic variance beyond current uses of criteria William Baker, Peter Loge link Hasty generalization revisited, part one: On being representative examples David Berube link Calling a counter-warrant a counter-warrant: An immodest proposal Richard Leeman, Ralph Hamlett link A descriptive analysis of CEDA judging philosophies, part one: Definitive acceptance or rejection of certain tactics and arguments Jim Brey
Link to original
Volume 11
Volume 11
Link Title Author link Resolutional relevance: A primary standard for evaluating criteria in non-policy debate Thomas Murphy, Melinda Murphy link Parameters for criteria debating David Berube link Development of the method of evaluation in CEDA debate Vince Meldrum link The potential for generic argumentation in Cross Examination Debate Association debate: Toward the development of standards Thomas Preston link The application of proximate cause to CEDA debate Irwin Mallin link A process perspective of definitional arguments Richard O’Dor link College debate: A quarter century later Thomas Steinfatt link An analysis of CEDA judging philosophies - part two: Accepting certain tactics and arguments with reservations James Brey link Taking CEDA debaters out of the normal tournament setting Pamela Stepp link To disclose or not to disclose? Mark Smith
Link to original
Volume 12
Volume 12
Link Title Author link Using argument fields to construct criteria in non-policy debate Bill Hill link What killed Schrodinger’s cat? Parametric topicality, that’s what David Berube link The impact of paradigm consistency on taxonomic boundaries in CEDA debate Craig Dudczak, Donald Day link Inexperienced and experienced debate judges: Beyond ‘name calling’ Sam Cox, Tammy Honse link Meaning as language use: The case of the language-linked value objection Ken Bahm link Black participation in CEDA debate: A quantification and analysis Peter Loge link A study of CEDA and NDT finalists speaking rates Kent Colbert link What do they have that I haven’t got? Comparison survey data of the resources and support systems of top CEDA programs and directors Jack Rogers link A report on the 1991 CEDA assessment conference Walter Ulrich link A bibliometric analysis of the CEDA yearbook Don Brownlee, Julia Johnson, Mike Buckley
Link to original
Volume 13
Volume 13
Link Title Author link Relocating presumption: Shifting burdens of proof in CEDA debate T.C. Winebrenner link Natural value hierarchies and presumption: Merging stipulated/artificial presumption with natural/psychological presumption Joseph Tuman link The function of presumption in academic debate Robert Rowland link Using presumption as a decision rule in value debate Karen Whedbee link Archbishop Whately and the concept of presumption: Lessons for non-policy debate Nicholas Burnett link A survey of top CEDA programs—1989-1990 Thomas Murphy link Avoiding discursive dissonance in debate Stephen Lewis link Normative expectations and codified rules: Problems in judging academic/competitive debate Stephen Wood
Link to original
Volume 14
Volume 14
Link Title Author link The value of competitive debate as a vehicle for promoting development of critical thinking ability Bill Hill link The need for an argumentative perspective for academic debate Robert Trapp link An answer to the call for experimentation by the CEDA assessment conference: A descriptive study of a peer-judged round Sam Cox, Clifton Adams link Debating values: An idea revitalized Kathleen Micken, Patrick Micken link Dominant form and marginalized voices: Argumentation about feminism(s) Carrie Crenshaw link Feminism, strategy, and pedagogy in intercollegiate debate Robert Rowland link A response to Crenshaw’s ‘Dominant form and marginalized voices’ Joseph Tuman link Pieces of a cultural puzzle Carrie Crenshaw
Link to original
Volume 15
Volume 15
Link Title Author link The legitimacy of non-truth-base standards in competitive academic debate Thomas Murphy link Claim without warrant: The lack of logical support for parametric topicality Ken Sherwood link A defense of critique arguments: Beyond the resolutional question Kenneth Broda-Bahm, Thomas Murphy link The justification of counterplans in non-policy debate: A skeptical view Gina Lane link An evolving model of presumption for non-policy debate Bill Hill link Cerebral gymanstics 101: Why do debaters debate? Kevin Jones link Argument borrowing and its obligations Carrie Crenshaw link Intuition, common sense, and judgment Brian McGee, Greggory Simerly
Link to original
Volume 16
Volume 16
Link Title Author link Developing student voices in academic debate through a feminist perspective of learning, knowing and arguing Kristine Bartanen link Authority as argument in academic debate T.C. Winebrenner link Parametric interpretation: Issues and answers David Berube link Enhancing critical thinking ability through academic debate Kent Colbert link Counterfactual possibilities: Constructing counter-to-fact causal claims Kenneth Broda-Bahm link Thinking in time: The importance of temporal location in argument Phillip Voight link The practical pedagogical function of academic debate Robert Rowland
Link to original
Volume 17
Volume 17
Link Title Author link Debating postmodernism Roy Schwartzman link Counterfactual problems: Addressing difficulties in the advocacy of counter-to-fact causal claims Kenneth Broda-Bahm link Metaphorical construction: Argument is war Roxanne Knutson link Defamatory statements on the CEDA-L: To what extent does the First Amendment protect on-line expression? Douglas Fraleigh link Policy advocacy and delaying action as refutation: Implications for argumentation pedagogy Theodore Prosise, Trond Jacobsen link Book reviews Don Brownlee, Carrie Crenshaw, Kenneth Broda-Bahm, Nicholas Burnett, Kimo Ah Yun
Link to original
Volume 18
Volume 18
Link Title Author link A community of unequals: An analysis of dominant and subdominant culturally linked perceptions of participation and success within intercollegiate competitive debate Jack Rogers link Policy debate as fiction: In defense of utopian fiat Brian McGee, David Romanelli link To elaborate or not — thinking about oral critiques: A study of ELM theory at the 1996 national CEDA tournament Russell Church, Mark Jones link Reasoning and risk: Debaters as an academically at-risk population Steve Hunt, Darin Garard, Greg Simerly link A feminist critique of intercollegiate debate Amanda Wilkins, Jeffrey Hobbs link Criticizing kritiks: Textual analysis re-examined David Berube link From the president: A leadership approach to bring CEDA debate into the twenty-first century Pamela Stepp link Book reviews Larry Underberg, Diana Carlin, Stephen Koch, Terry West, John Morello
Link to original
Volume 19
Volume 19
Link Title Author link Liability implications of forensic program administration Phillip Voight, Courtney Ward link Critique arguments as policy analysis: Policy debate beyond the rationalist perspective Pat Gehrke link Judgment after tabula rasa: Defending ‘least intervention’ Brian McGee link Voices from Ideafest: The Open Society Institute and urban debate in the U.S. Kenneth Broda-Bahm link The case for urban debate leagues Melissa Wade link Building open societies through debate Beth Breger link Reflections on the New York urban debate league and Ideafest II William Baker link Debating funding, funding debating: The Chicago debate commission’s tale of two cities Les Lynn link On preserving identity, debate, and finding home Ede Warner link Sharing the gift of debate: Notes from the Tuscaloosa debate league Carrie Crenshaw link The Detroit experience George Ziegelmueller link Ideafest II: The urban debate movement comes of age Alfred Snider link Memoir of a former urban debate league participant Edward Lee link Book reviews David Snowball, Christine Miller, William Foster
Link to original
Volume 20
Volume 20
Link Title Author link A counterfactual theory of fiat Kenneth Broda-Bahm link Fiat and the circumvention argument David Berube link Grounding negative fiat Kenneth Broda-Bahm link The decision-maker Michael Korcok link Locating negative fiat: A response to Korcok John Katsulas link Fiat, practical politics, and utopian possibilities: A response to Korcok Brian McGee link Buchanan’s opportunity cost theory as it applies to academic debate practices: A response to Korcok Gina Lane link ’The decision-maker’ and limits on negative fiat: An unfinished journey Dallas Perkins link Rebuttal Michael Korcok link Book reviews Tim Allen, Maxwell Schnurer, Stephen Koch
Link to original
Volume 21
Volume 21
Link Title Author link Characteristics of top fifty CEDA programs at the dawn of the new millennium Michael Bauer, Kelly Young link A quantitative analysis of eight versus six rounds of preliminary competition Kelly McDonald, Jeffrey Jarman link A preliminary study of the relationships between social support, self-esteem, and perceptions of sexual harassment in intercollegiate debate Mark Jones, Glenda Treadaway link Debunking mini-max reasoning: The limits of extended causal chains in contest debating Don Brownlee link Invitational debate Kenneth Broda-Bahm link Intercollegiate debate as invitational rhetoric: An offering Jeffrey Hobbs, Jodee Hobbs, Jeffrey Bile, Sue Lowrie, Amanda Wilkins, Virginia Milstead, Kristina Wallace link Response Sonja Foss link Response Cindy Griffin link Response Josina Makau link Reasoning together as dialectical partners: ‘Beyond persuasion’ toward ‘cooperative argumentation’ Jeffrey Bile link Book reviews Nicholas Burnett, Heidi Hamilton, Sue Wenzlaff, Leah White
Link to original
Volume 22
Volume 22
Link Title Author link ’Gone on debating:’ Competitive academic debate as a tool of empowerment. Warner, Ede;Bruschke, Jon link How well are we doing: Has the sexual harassment policy in CEDA debate worked? Stepp, Pamela L.;Gardner, Beth link Assessing argumentation in the 2000 political campaigns. McGee, Brian R. link Political argument and emotion: An analysis of 2000 presidential campaign discourse. Miller, Jerry L.;McKerrow, Raymie E. link Arguing to win: The Florida vote recount. Marty, Debian link (E)rasing identity and the limits of traditional argumentation theory. Crenshaw, Carrie link Political advertisements and decision-making shortcuts in the 2000 election. Sulfaro, Valerie A. link DebateWatch 2000: Reflections of a moderator. Williams, David E. link Book review: Televised presidential debates and public policy Don R. Swanson link Book review: Campaign ‘96: A functional analysis of acclaiming, attacking, and defending Terry West link Book review: Smart Tournament Administrator Konrad W. Hack link Book review: Tab Room on the PC Jon Bruschke
Link to original
Volume 23
Volume 23
Link Title Author link Longitudinal outcome assessment for forensics: Does participation in intercollegiate, competitive forensics contribute to measurable differences in positive student outcomes? Rogers, Jack E. link Does college debate inherit a lack of diversity from high school debate? McRee, Nick;Cote, Renee link Re-evaluating strategies for measuring sexual harassment in the debate and forensic community. Sulfaro, Valerie A. link Whatever happened to “value debate”?: Reflections on non-policy debating in CEDA. Brian R. McGee (editor); Michael Bartanen; David M. Berube; Dale A. Herbeck; John P. Katsulas; Linda M. Collier link Book reviews: A practical study of argument / Critical thinking Alan Razee link Book review: Critical thinking: Developing an effective worldview Leah E. White link Learning fallacies and arguments: A multimedia tutorial for critical thinking (book). Corcoran, Joe
Link to original
Volume 24
Volume 24
Link Title Author link Recruiting students into intercollegiate debate: Results of a national survey. Williams, David E.;Hughes, Patrick C. link CEDA forum Brian McGee, Alfred Snider, David Frank, Maxwell Schnurer, Ede Warner Jr., Steve Woods link Twenty years of gaming: On the influence of Alfred C. Snider. McGee, Brian R. link Gamemaster: Is it you? Snider, Alfred C. link The pedagogy and politics of solipsism. Frank, David A. link The hunter gets captured by the game: Reply to David Frank. Snider, Alfred C. link Gaming as control: Will to power, the prison of debate and game called potlatch. Schnurer, Maxwell link Paris nocturne: Reply to Schnurer. Snider, Alfred C. link Go homers, makeovers or takeovers? A privilege analysis of debate as a gaming simulation. Warner Jr., Ede link Small axe: Reply to Warner. Snider, Alfred C. link Changing the game? Embracing the advocacy standard. Woods, Steve link Judgment day: Reply to Woods. Alfred C. Snider link Book review: Argumentation: Analysis, evaluation, presentation Gordon Stables link Book review: The philosophy of argument Christopher Skiles link Book reviews: The miniature guide to critical thinking / The art of asking essential questions / Understanding the foundations of ethical reasoning Mark R. Crossman
Link to original
Volume 25
Volume 25
Link Title Author link Effects of watching a presidential primary debate. Benoit, William L.;Stephenson, Michael T. link Personalizing debating: Diversity and tolerance in the debate community. Zompetti, Joseph P. link Debating dogma and division. Louden, Allan link Debate’s culture of narcissism. Solt, Roger E. link Twilight of the topical idols: Kritik-ing in the age of imperialism. Shanahan, William link Debate factions and affirmative actions. Bruschke, Jon link Factions in policy debate: Some observations. Parcher, Jeff link Games, which from a long ways off looks like flies. Shuster, Kate
Link to original
Volume 26
Volume 26
Link Title Author link Political reasonableness in contemporary argumentation theory: A content analysis of the New York Times, 1860-2004. Hicks, Darrin;Margesson, Robert;Warrenburg, Kristine link Graduate school, professional, and life choices: An outcome assessment confirmation study measuring positive student outcomes beyond student experiences for participants in competitive intercollegiate forensics. Rogers, Jack E. link Researching non-presidential debates: A moment in time. Louden, Allan link Lucia Cormier vs. Margaret Chase Smith: Debate for the Maine Senate seat, November 5, 1960. Sarkela, Sandra J. link Questions of practice: The 2004 South Carolina Senate debates. McKown, Jamie link Group affiliation, association, and dissociation in the debate between New York senatorial candidates Hillary Clinton and Rick Lazio. Preston Jr., C. Thomas link A history of apologetics. Westerfelhaus, Robert
Link to original
Volume 27
Volume 27
Link Title Author link Forensic program resources: A national comprehensive study. Rogers, Jack E. link Gender inequity in debate, legal and business professions. Matz, S. Irene;Bruschke, Jon link Uncovering the intellectual diversity of common lines of argument in modern policy debate: Discovering an answer to the media’s call for renewed discussion in post-secondary education. Ryan, Sarah E.;Sovacool, Benjamin K. link CAD forum. Louden, Allan link On further integrating information technology or academic debate. O’Donnell, Timothy M. link Deliberating debate’s digital futures. Carly Woods; Matthew Brigham; Brent Heavner; Takuzo Konishi; John Rief; Brent Saindon; Gordon R. Mitchell link Women in debate: From virtual to material. Schwartz-DuPre, Rae Lynn link On-line debate record keeping and judge information: An imprudent look at the future. Bruschke, Jon;Nielson, Toni link Debate and the web: Creating synergy between evidence retrieval and production. Bauschard, Stefan link Internet debating: Technical solutions for the 21st century. Snider, Alfred C. link Argue into the camera, please: An exploration of comprehensive digital recording in debate. Morris, Eric link The interconnectedness between intercollegiate policy debate and the urban debate leagues: From a distance, five years and change later. Preston Jr., C. Thomas
Link to original
Volume 28
Volume 28
Link Title Author link Dinner and conversation at the argumentative table: Re-conceptualizing debate as an argumentative dialogue. Galloway, Ryan link A functional analysis of American mayoral debates. Benoit, William L.;Henson, Jayne R.;Maltos, Sheila link Argumentation and the international problem of genocide. Voth, Ben;Noland, Aaron link International appeal in the presidential inaugural: An update on genre and an expansion of argument. Dudash, Elizabeth link Menstruation discrimination: The menstrual taboo as a rhetorical function of discourse in the national and international advances of women’s rights. Thomas, Erika M. link The uses of history: Deliberative analogy and Victor Davis Hanson. Spring, Sarah link Thank you for arguing: What Aristotle, Lincoln, and Homer Simpson can teach us about the art of persuasion. Dimock, James P.;Cronn-Mills, Daniel
Link to original
Volume 29
Volume 29
Link Title Author link Academic debate as a decision-making game: Inculcating the virtue of practical wisdom. Strait, L. Paul;Wallace, Brett link Against dogmatism: A continued defense of switch side debate. Harrigan, Casey link Functional analysis of the 2008 Saddleback presidential forum. Benoit, William L.;Sudbrock, Leigh Anne link Guest forum on rhetorical genre. Kuswa, Kevin Douglas link Debating Michael Calvin McGee’s “critical” shift in rhetorical theory. Saindon, Brent Allen link On the consideration of ‘public diplomacy’ as a rhetorical genre. Gerber, Matthew G. link War rhetoric on the brink of destruction: Jefferson Davis and conditinal emancipation. Atchison, Jarrod link The slave, the fetus, the body: Articulating biopower and the pregnant woman. Kuswa, Kevin;Achter, Paul;Lauzon, Elizabeth link The Suicide Girls: Tattooing as radical feminist agency. Harlow, Megan Jean link Representations of debate in film. Sears, Will;Suengwon Chung
Link to original
Volume 30
Volume 30
Link Title Author link Debate as disease: Debate and the dialogue and deliberation movment. Busmek, Pete link Uruban debate and prejudice reduction: The contact hypothesis in action. Wade, M. Leslie;Wade, Melissa M.;Heilmayr, Dietlinde P. link The state of argumentation course at U.S. colleges and universities in the 21st century: A review of course inventories and curricula. McGee, Deborah Socha;McGee, Brian R.;Catherine, Mary link Great coaches making great debaters. Voth, Ben link Toward public sphere intercollegiate policy debate: The path to participation? Gerber, Matthew G. link Where did all the debaters g0? Strategies for developing relationships between high school and college programs. Lavelle, Katherine;Hamburger, Benjamin A. link Model proposal: Increasing Latina/o involvement in policy debate thorugh summer debate workshops. Pineda, Richard;Salinas, Chris
Link to original
Volume 31
Volume 31
Link Title Author link Toward a theory of legitimate justification critiques. Scott J. Varda, John W. Cook link Introduction: Intercollegiate policy debate topic selection Gordon Stables link Conditionality, cheating counterplans, and critiques: Topic construction and the rise of the “negative case” Aaron Hardy link Supplying a well-rounded education: A case for mandatory topic rotation Sarah Topp, Brett Bricker link Flexible debate topics revisited: The case for logical limited resolutional conditionality Sarah Elizabeth Spring link Suggested guidelines for controversial area papers Gordon Stables
Link to original
Volume 32
Volume 32
Link Title Author link Impossible convictions: Convictions and intentionality in performance and switch-side debate. Kelly Michael Young link A functional analysis of the 2011 engligh language Canadian prime minister debate. William L. Benoit link Debate as pedagogy. Michael Davis link Competition as education: Bringing the tournament to the classroom William Mosley-Jensen link Who cares?: Learning perspective taking through stakeholders R. Jarrod Atchison link Switch-side debate exercise Kevin Kuswa link The public debate writing assignment: Developing an academically engaged debate audience Michael Davis, Peter Bsumek
Link to original
Volume 33
Volume 33
Link Title Author link I concur, you are absolutely correct that I am correct: Agreement as an argumentative strategy. Sara K Straub, Jeremie L. Beller, Tim Hunt link Introduction to the special issue on digital debate and assessment Gordon Stables link Arguing for debate: Introducing key components for assessment of intercollegiate debate programs. Sarah Taylor Partlow-Lefevre link Authentic assessment in debate: An argument for using ballots to foster talent-development and promote authentic learning Sarah Stone Watt link Open source debating: The justifications and responses to Deacon Source version 1.0 Jarrod Atchison, Ian Miller link Putting debate back into debate: Digital debate and evidence Travis Cram link One if by land, two if by sea, three if by format: British debate is coming Stephen Llano
Link to original
Volume 34
Volume 34
Link Title Author link Does file sharing during debates enable effective judging? Morris, Eric link Intercollege policy debate: Staffing, resources, responsibilities, and competitive success. Jarman, Jeffrey W. link Restoring balance: An academic review of arguments for and against the restriction of presidential war powers. Kelly M. Young; John P. Koch; Bruce Najor; Al Hiland; Jacob Justice; Brad Meloche; Talya Slaw; Avery Henry
Link to original
Volume 35
Volume 35
Link Title Author link The other British invasion: Theorizing British parliamentary debate. Eckstein, Justin;Llano, Stephen M. link Role fulfillment as a measure of argument quality: Lessons from British parliamentary debate. Paroske, Marcus link British parliamentary debate considered as praxis for argumentation. Llano, Stephen M. link British parliamentary debate, polarization and collaboration. Barker, Pamela A. link British parliamentary debate as deliberative debate. Franke, Melissa Rae
Link to original
Volume 36
Volume 36
Link Title Author link Evidence based decision making and assessment for the Cross Examination Debate Association Paul E. Mabrey III, Keith Richards link 100 years of the Healthy Debate Initiative: Revisiting Walter Swift’s “The hygiene of the voice before debates” R. Jarrod Atchison, Sherry Hall link Contemporary reflections on Frank Lane’s 1915 essay “Faculty help in intercollegiate contests” Edward M. Panetta link ”The need for research,” revisited Matthew P. Brigham link Making debate normal: The Texas Normal Debating League’s democratic and pedogogical functions Brian Lain, Karen Anderson-Lain, Laura Oliver
Link to original
Volume 37
Volume 37
Link Title Author link Remembering the life and scholarship of Alfred “Tuna” Snider. Schwartz-DuPre, Rae Lynn;Parmett, Helen Morgan link From resolutions to motions: Moving in a different direction. Snider, Alfred link Final frontiers: The perpetual explanatory power of Alfred Snider’s gaming theories for contemporary intercollegiate policy debate. Gerber, Matthew G.;Nagel, Jeff link Debate across the disciplnes: Structured classroom debates in interdisciplinary curricula. Merrell, Brandon;Calderwood, Kevin J.;Graham, Todd link Many more sides: Debate across the curriculum and around the globe. Iberri-Shea, Gina link Conexiónes in Venezuela: Dr. Snider’s cross-cultural empowerment pedagogy. Andrade, Luis M.;Montes, Brenda link Spaceship Earth: The global legacy of Dr. Alfred “Tuna” Snider. Jarvis, Jason L. link Successful argumentative strategies in debating. Faktorngpan, Piyanart link Digitisation, education and debating: Taking forward the ideas and inspiration of Alfred Snider into the digital age. Douse, Mike link Debating convivially: Alfred Tuna Snider’s Illichian approach to debate & the university. Parmett, Helen Morgan link Tuna’s legacy as a challenge to communication scholarship: An embody of work. Llano, Stephen M. link Doctor Who? Doctor Tuna! Nelson, Sam link An interview with Alfred C. Snider. LaHood-Burns, Delainey
Link to original
Volume 38
Volume 38
Link Title Author Full Text Volume 38 (2023) special issue: Identity, performance, & debate: Celebrating the 20th anniversary of the Louisville Project in full issue Journal information and editorial board link Journal editor’s welcome. Souders, Michael in full issue Table of contents link Preface Jennifer Harris link Special issue editor’s introduction: Celebrating the legacy of the Louisville Project and grappling with the Antiblackness still plaguing college policy debate. Shanara Reid-Brinkley link Niggatry, liquidation, and the timeless struggle of niggas in an anti-Black world Ignacio Evans link Indebted: The compounding politics of Black and trans argumentation in intercollegiate policy debate Beau Larsen link Eleazar, Native debate, and the stakes of concession Taylor Brough link Clash of the uncivilized: An alternative approach to policy debate Charles Athanasopoulos and Corinne Mitsuye Sugino link We have a job to do: An examination of the coach’s role in the development of a diverse student population Tiffany Dillard-Knox link In honor of the Louisville Project: Allying instead of allyship to support minority debaters Lauren Christie and Nick J. Sciullo link Defending whiteness: The psychic life of anti-Blackness on Grindr Luis M. Andrade and Deven Cooper link Afterword: Fear of a Black planet: Capturing the benefit of white guilt to forward Black excellence. Shauntrice Martin in full issue List of contributors
Link to original
38 items under this folder.