| link | The nature of the topic in value debate | Walter Urlich |
| link | A case for debating propositions of policy | Bertram Gross |
| link | Justification of values in terms of action: Rationale for a modified policy-making paradigm in value debate | M. Anway Jones, Stephen Crawford |
| link | Propositional analysis: A need for focus in CEDA debate | Tim Dixon, Chris Leslie |
| link | On prima facie value argumentation: The policy implications affirmative | Gregory Young, Paul Gaske |
| link | On negative strategy in value debate | Alan Cirlin |
| link | An alternative approach to negative speaker duties | Michael Gotcher, Thompson Biggars |
| different article — needs replacement | The case against counterwarrants in value proposition debate | Rich Simon |
| link | Debating hasty generalization | David Berube |
| link | Theoretical illegitimacy of speculative value objections | Richard Dempsey |
| link | An audience analysis curriculum: Its theory, practice and implications | Thomas Miller, Kenneth McVay |
| link | An analysis of CEDA and NDT judging philosophies | Mike Allen, Lisa Dowdy |
| link | On consideration of judging in CEDA debate tournaments — a modest proposal | Thompson Biggars, Michael Gotcher |
| link | Judging CEDA debate: A systems perspective | Steven Brydon |
| link | Towards a paradigm for CEDA | James Hallmark |
| different article — needs replacement | A projection of CEDA’s near future | Don Brownlee |