| Link | Title | Author |
|---|
| link | The value of competitive debate as a vehicle for promoting development of critical thinking ability | Bill Hill |
| link | The need for an argumentative perspective for academic debate | Robert Trapp |
| link | An answer to the call for experimentation by the CEDA assessment conference: A descriptive study of a peer-judged round | Sam Cox, Clifton Adams |
| link | Debating values: An idea revitalized | Kathleen Micken, Patrick Micken |
| link | Dominant form and marginalized voices: Argumentation about feminism(s) | Carrie Crenshaw |
| link | Feminism, strategy, and pedagogy in intercollegiate debate | Robert Rowland |
| link | A response to Crenshaw’s ‘Dominant form and marginalized voices’ | Joseph Tuman |
| link | Pieces of a cultural puzzle | Carrie Crenshaw |