| Link | Title | Author |
|---|
| link | Using argument fields to construct criteria in non-policy debate | Bill Hill |
| link | What killed Schrodinger’s cat? Parametric topicality, that’s what | David Berube |
| link | The impact of paradigm consistency on taxonomic boundaries in CEDA debate | Craig Dudczak, Donald Day |
| link | Inexperienced and experienced debate judges: Beyond ‘name calling’ | Sam Cox, Tammy Honse |
| link | Meaning as language use: The case of the language-linked value objection | Ken Bahm |
| link | Black participation in CEDA debate: A quantification and analysis | Peter Loge |
| link | A study of CEDA and NDT finalists speaking rates | Kent Colbert |
| link | What do they have that I haven’t got? Comparison survey data of the resources and support systems of top CEDA programs and directors | Jack Rogers |
| link | A report on the 1991 CEDA assessment conference | Walter Ulrich |
| link | A bibliometric analysis of the CEDA yearbook | Don Brownlee, Julia Johnson, Mike Buckley |