| Link | Title | Author |
|---|
| link | Debating propositions of value: An idea revisited | Ronald Matlon |
| link | Inherency as a stock issue in non-policy propositions | Craig Dudczak |
| link | Intrinsic justification: Meaning and method | Kenneth Bahm |
| link | When the whole becomes a black hole: Implications of the holistic perspective | Arnie Madsen, Robert Chandler |
| link | Catastrophe and criterion: A case for justification | Ann Gill |
| link | Definitional issues in the pursuit of argumentative understandings: A critique of contemporary practice | James Cantrill |
| link | Propositional justification: Another view | Jeffrey Bile |
| link | Assessing counter-warrants: Understanding induction in debate practice | Brian McGee |
| link | The forensics critic as an ‘ideologue-critic’: An argument for ideology as a new paradigm for academic debate | Gregory Miller |
| link | A cognitive model of evaluating judgments | Don Brownlee, Mark Woolsey |
| link | The role of the critic and the audience-centered model of debate: Problems and possibilities | J. Michael Gotcher, Ronald Greene |
| link | Knowing the judge: The key to successful debate | Mary Gill |