| Link | Title | Author |
|---|
link
| Debating propositions of value: an idea revisited | Ronald Matlon |
link
| Inherency as a stock issue in non-policy propositions | Craig Dudczak |
link
| Intrinsic justification: meaning and method | Kenneth Bahm |
link
| When the whole becomes a black hole: implications of the holistic perspective | Arnie Madsen, Robert Chandler |
link
| Catastrophe and criterion: a case for justification | Ann Gill |
link
| Definitional issues in the pursuit of argumentative understandings: a critique of contemporary practice | James Cantrill |
link
| Propositional justification: another view | Jeffrey Bile |
link
| Assessing counter-warrants: understanding induction in debate practice | Brian McGee |
link
| The forensics critic as an ‘ideologue-critic’: an argument for ideology as a new paradigm for academic debate | Gregory Miller |
link
| A cognitive model of evaluating judgments | Don Brownlee, Mark Woolsey |
link
| The role of the critic and the audience-centered model of debate: problems and possibilities | J. Michael Gotcher, Ronald Greene |
link
| Knowing the judge: the key to successful debate | Mary Gill |